Research / BFI Working Paper•Jan 21, 2022

Should We Have Automatic Triggers for Unemployment Benefit Duration and How Costly Would They Be?

Gabriel Chodorow-Reich, Peter Ganong, Jonathan Gruber

We model automatic trigger policies for unemployment insurance by simulating a weekly panel of individual labor market histories, grouped by state. We reach three conclusions: (i) policies designed to trigger immediately at the onset of a recession result in benefit extensions that occur in less sick labor markets than the historical average for benefit extensions; (ii) the ad hoc extensions in the 2001 and 2007-09 recessions compare favorably ex post to common proposals for automatic triggers; (iii) compared to ex post policy, the cost of common proposals for automatic triggers is close to zero.

More Research From These Scholars

BFI Working Paper • May 22, 2019

Why Has Regional Income Convergence in the U.S. Declined?

Peter Ganong, Daniel Shoag
Topics:  Uncategorized
BFI Working Paper • May 22, 2019

The Decline, Rebound, and Further Rise in SNAP Enrollment: Disentangling Business Cycle Fluctuations and Policy Changes

Peter Ganong, Jeffrey B. Liebman
Topics:  Employment & Wages
BFI Working Paper • May 22, 2019

Consumer Spending During Unemployment: Positive and Normative Implications

Peter Ganong, Pascal Noel
Topics:  COVID-19